help of de.wp admins to determine what images have
been made less free
through this would be beneficial, but that exploit is no reason to
delete in of and as of itself imo.
?! The misuse cases are not the reason for the abolition of GFDL-1.2(-only).
And "that exploit is no reason to delete" thus is (most likely unintentional)
a strawmanish argument.
Invalid license revocation transcends the GFDL-1.2 problem and we don't really
have to discuss it here. I think it's pretty clear that such actions (if
committed in bad faith) warrant a block.
--
[[en:User:Dschwen]]
[[de:Benutzer:Dschwen]]
[[commons:User:Dschwen]]