Maarten,

The problem to solve is that people who are looking for an image of a cucumber or a children's toy 
may not appreciate being presented with an image where the item in question is used for masturbation.

I asked Brandon about the search algorithm; he told me he had just answered the same question here:

http://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-second-image-returned-on-Wikimedia-Commons-when-one-searches-for-electric-toothbrush-an-image-of-a-female-masturbating

There are some comments from Pete Forsyth at that link as well; he noted that the same search results 
also appear for multimedia searches in the Wikipedias (e.g. http://www.webcitation.org/62OEEbIub ).

Cheers,
Andreas


From: Maarten Dammers <maarten@mdammers.nl>
To: commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Wednesday, 12 October 2011, 20:38
Subject: Re: [Commons-l] Commons search function vs. Google

Hi Andreas,

Op 11-10-2011 23:36, Andreas Kolbe schreef:
Maarten,

That sounds like the most plausible answer to me to date. We know that sexual images are among the most popular in Commons.

<knip>

This is something the personal image filter would (in part) address. We could also have a look at our search algorithm.
That sounds like a solution to a problem, but you didn't actually state the problem. What's the problem you're trying to solve?

Maarten




_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l