Yeah its incompatible, SA license requires
- *Share Alike*—If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same, similar or a compatible license.
the is an exception that the copyright holder may waiver any condition of a SA license.
The site licensing clearly isnt the same, similar or compatible. Interestingly if the images are individually licensed cc-by-3.0 then they are able to reuse without restriction or requesting a waiver.
The image in http://euobserver.com/7/28830 is a cc-by-3.0 license while the attribution isnt correct the resue is compatible While the image in http://euobserver.com/7/28767 is a satalite photograph, which I have yet to locate on en:WP or Commons but the its either a PD license or its a government agency license either way attribution shouldnt be to WP
the other are proving a little difficult to track down for the purpose of giving example in this email that the image may be reusable under a different license than cc-by-sa
2009/10/23 Py mouss pymouss44@gmail.com
The license of the site (http://euobserver.com/static/terms) seems to be incompatible with the use of pictures licensed CC-BY-SA, no ?
2009/10/22 Lars Aronsson lars@aronsson.se
Nicolas Guérin wrote:
Well, there's no really need to cite Wikipedia, because the license said that the author (the person who took the picture) and the license should
be
mentionned. To cite "Wikipedia" is welcome but not necessary.
Maybe we should just rename Wikimedia Commons to you-are-free-to-reuse-it.org
-- Lars Aronsson (lars@aronsson.se) Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se
Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l