Hoi,
When you want to know about a subject like this, what do you learn at Brittanica... also when I search for ejaculation at my Wikipedia there is no word spelled like that.

This has become such a silly subject. It makes no difference to state that there is controversial content. There is controversy in so many ways and it is clear that the reasons for controversy are not universal.

If anything I am pretty pleased that this whole issue is no skin of my nose. It is a no win situation or an all lose situation. The people who are against controversial content will be unhappy with what they will consider halfbaked. The people who allow for controversial content will be unhappy because they will find frustrated by what they consider an obtrusion.
'
Commenting ad nauseam that there is controversial content is as bad. It does not help.

PS Yes I am frustrated.
Thanks,
     GerardM

On 14 October 2011 14:27, Paul Houle <paul@ontology2.com> wrote:
On 10/12/2011 7:07 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
Maarten,

The problem to solve is that people who are looking for an image of a cucumber or a children's toy 
may not appreciate being presented with an image where the item in question is used for masturbation.


      It's a general issue that content on Wikimedia Foundation sites is often not safe for a wide range of ages.  For instance,  consider the video on this page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ejaculation

      This isn't something you'd see in the encyclopedia Britannica.  People often think of Wikipedia as a family-friendly place that's good for education,  and that's true for about 99.8% percent of it,  but somewhere around the 1-in-1,000 levels you find stuff that would have trouble with some people's idea of "community standards."


_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l