http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Lecture_at_Output.jpg

Image:Lecture_at_Output.jpg

Reuploaded after deletion. Without blanking slide it's Commons:Derivative works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Keep Yuri Landman's own work. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

•  On hold Wrote an email for permission [[ Forrester ]] 16:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Waiting for permission.  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 16:57, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

• Keep I don't understand why it need a permission if the photo + the illsutration on screen is the work of the uploader and if this person gives us the right to use it. I don't get it! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Because it's available on the internet. [[ Forrester ]] 20:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

No it's not. I've the h-res and there is no place on the internet which shows the h-res, so this is wrong. Yuri Landman Hypercustom (talk) 10:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

So what? It doesn't matter if it's available eslewhere, that's not a reason of deletion! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:14, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

It definitely is since third parties rights could be infringed upon. [[ Forrester ]] 16:35, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

• Keep landman's own work afaik indeed, used in article. oscar 09:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

"afaik"? How far do you know? Is it enough to be sure for us? [[ Forrester ]] 23:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I send Forrester as well as commons a reply for permission and received a reply in which wikipedia commons confirmed all is okay currently, So this request for deletion can be closed savely. Please ask commons for a confirmation or otherwise mail me again on the email address mentioned on my website www.hypercustom.com to repermit me again. Oscar knows all about me and my work from the Dutch wikipedia, so you can pretty well trust his opinion as well as mine. Yuri Landman Hypercustom (talk) 20:03, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

No, the OTRS agent that has dealt with your email asked you to choose a specific free license (2008100310026237). —Pill (talk) 18:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

This is wrong. I did reply and filled in a license spec. You didn't contact me about anything after I send the mail. You confirmed you've received it and it must be good now, otherwise ask me on www.hypercustom.com. Help, suggest and I'll confirm all needed licenses. Keep in mind I've to deal with English, while I'm Dutch, so it's easy for you to corner me with difficult words. Yuri Landman Hypercustom (talk) 10:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Yuri, please send them a specific free license because saying "choose one free, I don't care" is not that safe. [[ Forrester ]] 19:58, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

It is 100% safe. It means: You are allowed to use it in every way, I don't care which license you propose and I'll agree on every needed one. I'm Dutch not native English. Can you understand this is limiting my language and explanations? Yuri Landman Hypercustom (talk) 10:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC)