At the German Wikipedia a similar template ({{Bild-wahrscheinlich-GFDL}}, "Image likely to be GFDL") has been deleted recently because it was not clear in some cases whether the user really wanted to release it under this license. de:User:Historiograf stated that one should not simply assume a license under which a picture is released, especially it a user did not understand the "legal technicalities".3. In order to grant their obvious wish to release these images under a free license, we add GFDL and CC-BY-SA-2.5 to all of these images 4. We leave {{OwnWork}} and change it into a notice that the license information below is assumed, and if the author doesn't agree, (s)he should write a note on the talk page or fix it directlyThat's not a bad idea actually. As long as we leave {{OwnWork}}. With all our bots running around now there should be far fewer cases. Probably I would just make it {{GFDL}} though. I think it'd be stretching it to put a CC license, just because we like them. :) Whereas it's much more likely they're aware that Wikipedia is GFDL. At the moment {{own work}} actually says it is depreciated to NLD. :| I rather disagree with this but I understand the need for it. These OwnWorks just hang around forever... Brianna