Hoi,
I heard it the first time and it does not hold water. For me this argument is in between splitting hairs and sophistry.
Thanks,
     GerardM


On 26 June 2014 12:11, geni <geniice@gmail.com> wrote:



On 26 June 2014 07:02, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi,
The operational word in your mail is "copyright holder". When the party or parties who you INSIST have a copyright deny that they do like the Israeli government does, your whole argument becomes a puddle.
Thanks,
     GerardM


The Israeli government has denied no such thing. All it has stated is that it doesn't hold the copyrights within Israel. We have no documentation of it expressing a position on its overseas copyrights. Is there any part of this you don't understand?


--
geni

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l