Hoi,
With a growing network in the GLAM work we can get attention for this collection. When you read the documentation, Corbis did the equivalent of strip-farming. They took everything where the copyright is with them out and now what is left is the material that does not have clarity about the copyright holder.

Given that Mr Bill Gates is involved in Corbis, we can see what his appreciation is of this situation. Also the European Union is pondering what to do with orphan works. When we adopt this collection, it allows us to put pressure on the copyright junkies.
Thanks,
      GerardM


2011/2/28 Delphine Ménard <notafishz@gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Liam Wyatt <liamwyatt@gmail.com> wrote:
> Responding to Gnangarra - this is a very interesting issue indeed, and one
> that we might be able to make a big impact with, but I don't think this is a
> Wikimedia FOUNDATION issue as it involves the creation/purchase of content.
> Rather I would suggest that this is an issue that falls within the scope of
> the Chapters - in this case WM-FR. Either money could be spent directly from
> a chapter(s) budget or potentially the chapter(s) could run a specific
> donation-drive to fund such a purchase? Besides, how much are we talking
> here? $50,000? $500,000? $5million?
>
> Response to Jon - the way I read that, it means that 75% of the photographs
> were taken under contract with Corbis and therefore the copyright would come
> with the purchase of the collection. Any purchase could presumably be
> specified to only those images which come WITH the copyright.

It's not exactly clear to me.
One thing though, if the copyright lies with an agency, it lies with
Sygma, and not Corbis. Or rather, with the company that resulted of
Sygma's buying and that is being dissolved.
But the phrasing is very strange, and talks about a contract not being
signed, so I am really not sure what the exact copyright status of
this collection is.

One thing is certain, it's a huge amount of photographs (some 12,5
millions, 7km of shelves!), which means that as such there is little
chance that Wikimedia (France or other) has the financial potential to
on the one hand buy the collection (although Gnangarra has a point in
that it's probably not too expensive), but more importantly to
preserve such a collection.


Delphine


--
@notafish

NB. This gmail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails will get lost.
Intercultural musings: Ceci n'est pas une endive - http://blog.notanendive.org
Photos with simple eyes: notaphoto - http://photo.notafish.org

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l