On 28/05/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/28/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
> I ask because I have use right now for some
examples of photographers
> who contribute professional-quality work under GFDL *and sell it as
> well* to those who don't want to simply use it under GFDL. (Because
> GFDL is easy to obey in books and on the web, but damn near impossible
> in magazines or pamphlets.) I have some photographers I want to
> convince that putting stuff on Commons is good advertising for their
Given our licencing policies and what we know about
the likely future
of the GNU Simpler Free Documentation License I would suggest that
what you are doing may be accidentally misleading.
Um, what do "we" know about this? Apart from it being more or less a
great big special case for Wikipedia.