On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Codeispoetry <codeispoetry@adrianlang.de> wrote:
On Thu, March 13, 2008 8:14 pm, Bryan Tong Minh wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Bryan Tong Minh
> <bryan.tongminh@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Deleting it many images.
>>
> That should have said "Deleting it implies deleting 3867 images".

That's not correct since many of these files are double licensed. And in fact a template which is
mainly used to disrupt the project is not really useful.
 
Could you elaborate on what you are refering to?   It is hard for me to imagine how the presense of absense of "or later versions" could really be a significant disruption to the project, given that there isn't even a later version to refer to.
 
-Robert A. Rohde
 
PS. Along with Gmaxwell, I am one of those people who uses GFDL-1.2 rather than simply GFDL because as a matter of principle I prefer not to agree to new licenses until I've at least had a chance to review them.