On 29/12/06, Chris McKenna <cmckenna(a)sucs.org> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, David Gerard wrote:
> (Mind you, I already get phone calls from
journalists who can't work
> out what the hell is where on the typical image description page. The
> current format *sucks* for reusers, even when they find their image.
> Anyone want to work out an Image: page that looks more like something
> you'd see in a commercial photo archive, or on Flickr?)
What about the current layout do journalists not
understand/not like?
Finding the author/uploader or even being able to work out which bit
of the interface is the username. Working out that clicking on that
will take them to the uploader's user page. If the uploader has a
userpage on Commons at all. Etc.
- d.