On 05/16/2011 11:57 AM, Chris McKenna wrote:
Nor is it the mission of Commons to pander to the
matter how common (and outside the US they really aren't at all)
"Pander" is a word doesn't in the least bit describe what anyone is
suggesting or in fact doing. "(and outside the US they really aren't at
all)" is a factual error.
(Sensibilities are not common in Australia? Britain? Canada? Japan?
China? India? Indonesia? Turkey? Egypt? ...? )
Actually, he is using pander correctly to describe our exaggerated
attention to this matter at the demand of a small group of people.
The world wide audience is another matter.