Wait, so we're moving a few 100 files, creating a new project, and adding onto the burden of our already overworked technical team so we can remove two sentences from project policy? The "staying true to our colors" reasoning sounds obsessive-compulsive.
I'll ask again because I may very well be missing something here: why exactly should we start the "allrightsreserved" project?On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Manuelt15 <manuelt15.wiki@gmail.com> wrote:
If it's only for Wikimedia copyrighted logos/files, you have my support.2011/2/1 Teofilo <teofilowiki@gmail.com>
2011/2/1 Teofilo <teofilowiki@gmail.com>:
> 2011/2/1 David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>:"Share alike" means "thou shalt not create a hybrid monster". But
>> On 1 February 2011 08:59, Alex Brollo <alex.brollo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2011/2/1 Alex Brollo <alex.brollo@gmail.com>
>
>>
>> There would be a push to expand it to fair use. I would call this a
>> bad idea myself. Fair use should stay deprecated IMO, not encouraged
>> with a central repository.
>
> I think it is better to create a separate horror museum so that people
> wanting to create monsters can have their cake and eat it. I am aghast
> to see hybrid monsters with a free body and an unfree head being
> uploaded on Commons, and Commons having no clear rule against those.
>
> At least Commons will be freed from such Frankenstein creatures.
people fail to see this, because at present allrightsreserved and free
contents are too close to each other on the same Commons website.
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l