checkuser-l is chasing cross-wiki vandals. Problems we've noticed:
1. Flickr review just checks whether an image is marked on Flickr as
cc-by or cc-by-sa.
2. There's no protection against someone changing the licensing.
The actual threat model is someone bringing a case of copyright
infringement. Would screenshots of the licence as was be enough for
2.?
- d.
The Libre Graphics Meeting needs some financial support in a hurry.
The development of Free image editing software benefits from LGM -
specifically GIMP and Inkscape, two well-loved programs among
Commoners. Please consider donating and/or forwarding this message to
someone who might be able to help.
cheers,
Brianna
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jon Phillips <jon(a)rejon.org>
Date: 2 Apr 2008 15:44
Subject: [Clipart] Help Support Libre Graphics Meeting 2008!
To: Inkscape Development Mailing List
<inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net>, inkscape-users
<inkscape-user(a)lists.sourceforge.net>, Open Clip Art Library list
<clipart(a)lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Openfontlibrary(a)lists.freedesktop.org"
<openfontlibrary(a)lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Openfontlibrary(a)lists.freedesktop.org"
<openfontlibrary(a)lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Louis Desjardins <louis.desjardins(a)gmail.com>, Dave Neary
<dneary(a)free.fr>, "kamila.giedrojc" <kamila.giedrojc(a)gmail.com>
I'm working with Dave neary, Louis Desjardins and Kamila (lead organizer
this year) to do a big loud announcement about LGM 2008 in Poland!
Here is my own blog post about. Please post your own! Take from mine!
http://rejon.org/2008/04/01/support-the-libre-graphics-meeting-2008-in-pola…
Can someone do big blog post about LGM 2008 fundraising campaign to
raise 20k USD by friday APRIL 18 on inkscape.org...Also, if there is any
other way to spread the news, that would be helpful...please others,
blog about the campaign along with the widget...if there are businesses,
or those with access to funding, now is the time to help out your
favorite project!
My blog post already filtered to Open Clip Art Library and the planets,
but OFLB folks, need to figure out blog post there too, right?
Jon
###
Support the Libre Graphics Meeting 2008 in Poland
Donate here! http://pledgie.com/campaigns/613
What is the Libre Graphics Meeting?
The Libre Graphics Meeting brings together developers and users
of free software graphics applications, such as the GIMP,
Inkscape, Scribus, Blender, Krita, the Open Clipart Library and
more.
In its third edition, the organization needs your help! You can
support your favorite graphics application, and ensure that the
travel costs of as many volunteer developers as possible are
paid to ensure that this edition of the conference is more
successful that its predecessors. The conference is May 8 - 11
in Wroclaw, Poland.
Where will the money go?
We have kept costs associated with infrastructure to a minimum.
Over 80% of the conference budget will be spent on subsidizing
travel and accommodation costs for developers. $20K is the goal
to raise by Friday April 18! Help out!
A non-profit organization
All donations will be made to the conference organizers via the
GNOME Foundation, a 501(c)3 tax exempt US-based non-profit, so
donations will be tax deductible for US taxpayers. We would like
to thank the GNOME Foundation for their support.
###
--
Jon Phillips
San Francisco, CA
CHINA PH +86 1-360-282-8624
jon(a)rejon.org
http://www.rejon.org
MSN, AIM, Yahoo Chat, Skype: kidproto
Jabber Chat: rejon(a)gristle.org
IRC: rejon(a)irc.freenode.net
Projects: http://rejon.org/projects
_______________________________________________
clipart mailing list
clipart(a)lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/clipart
--
They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment:
http://modernthings.org/
The folks at Creative Commons have posted a draft statement of intent
regarding the CC-BY-SA license:
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Draft_Attribution-ShareAlike_Intent
I've just read through it, and I'm really, really happy. Through this
statement, CC has taken a first stab at defining in detail their
intentions as stewards of the license. This is key to building trust
with the Wikimedia community and other stakeholders in the free
culture movement.
The statement of intent clarifies a number of key points, including a
commitment to keep the license in compliance with the Definition of
Free Cultural Works, and a strong promise to only broaden, but not
narrow the definition of what constitutes an adaptation under the
terms of the license.
We are continuing our conversations about that particular aspect, and
my personal hope is that we will figure out a way to clearly state
through the license that adaptations such as a picture embedded into a
newspaper article trigger the share-alike clause, i.e. the newspaper
article would be CC-BY-SA licensed. (Or, as I would argue, in those
particular cases, any other DFCW compliant license.)
You can post comments regarding the draft on the wiki talk page, or on
the cc-licenses mailing list:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
This is a really important development, and I hope that everyone who
cares about the future of free culture licenses will get involved in
these conversations. :-)
My congratulations go to Creative Commons for taking this initiative.
--
Erik Möller
Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation
Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
Unfortunately, the time will not work. I am interested though.
----- Original Message ----
From: Craig Spurrier <craig(a)craigweb.net>
To: Wikimedia Commons Discussion List <commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 2, 2008 8:06:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Commons-l] Credentialing
The big problem with this proposal and the current Wikinews system is
community accreditation is very weak and the Wikimedia Foundation has
said they can not safely issue credentials. It appears that a separate
organization is the only workable solution. A few months ago I proposed
the creation of a Wikinews Foundation. The project has been retitled to
the Collaborative Media Network. The mission has also been generalized
somewhat to providing similar services to other like news organizations,
though Wikinews remains the primary focus. I have been working for a
while on the details needed to make the Collaborative Media Network
happen. We are about ready to file the incorporation paperwork and are
currently working on selecting a board. We will be having an IRC meeting
to discuss the details on Thursday, April 3 at 21:00UTC (5pm EDT) @
#collabmedianet irc.freenode.com. If you are interested in the proposal
I encourage you to attend. The time and date are definitely not ideal,
but I think getting things moving asap is very important. Future
meetings will be held at hopefully better time/dates.
-Craig Spurrier
[[n:Craig Spurrier]]
Geoffrey Plourde wrote:
> Below is the current draft of my proposal. Thoughts?
>
> WIKIMEDIA COMMONS ACCREDITATION POLICY
> (PROPOSED)
>
>
> Without credentials, Commons photographers fall under the broad
> category of freelance photographers. Some museums have indicated
> disapproval of freelance photography of their collections, which is a
> significant stumbling block on obtaining good free photographs of
> historical items. By credentialing photographers, these museums might
> be persuaded to allow photography of their collections, for
> educational purposes.
>
>
> Wikinews already has an accreditation process for reporters. Some
> individuals involved in that process have expressed an interest in
> having a pool of Commons photographers to accompany reporters.
> However, the photographers would also need credentials in order to
> gain access to the events, due to security precautions.
>
>
> Interested photographers would need to be officially vouched by
> Commons. There will need to be a process for accreditation of users,
> and for revocation of credentials.
>
> Commons will need to respond to requests for verification. This will
> allow the requesting organization to make sure that the photographer
> is indeed accredited by Commons.
>
> In addition, the processes for Commons and Wikinews should at some
> point be merged on Meta to allow streamlined and efficent excahnge,
> issuing and verification.
>
> ==Policy on Accreditation==
>
> Photographers will need to request accreditation from the Commons
> Accredition Project prior to attempting to claim accreditation. The
> request should be in the form of an entry, signed and dated, on a page
> specifically designated by the Project. The request must include a
> rationale for why the user wants accreditation. As an advisory
> precaution, the community will have 7 days to either voice objections
> or support for the request. At the expiration of this time period the
> user will either be granted a pending accreditation, or the vote removed.
>
> The Issuing Authority will only issue a credential after the following
> criteria have been met.
>
> -User has demonstrated that they are an established contributor
>
> -Provision of their real name
>
> -Verified their account
>
> -Provision of a scanned ID with a picture of the user
>
> -Provision of a passport sized picture that matches the one on the ID
>
>
>
> Upon the fulfillment of the above criteria, the Project's Issuing
> Authority will generate a printable image of a personalized Commons
> Photographer ID Card that a user may print and laminate at their
> expense, and cause the addition of the credential to the Roster.
>
> ==Policy on Verification==
>
> Commons credential verification
> <file:///wiki/Wikinews:Credential_verification> will be processed by
> users who volunteer for the task. The request may come in in three forms:
>
> *
>
> Visit to a protected page listing community-accepted users with
> Wikimedia Commons credentials.
>
> *
>
> Voicemail message on a Commons phone line
>
> *
>
> Fax to a Wikinews fax line
>
> The protected page will be kept by sysops on Commons.
>
> The voice line will be a VoIP <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VoIP> line
> with online voicemail delivery to a mailing list of users who
> volunteer to deal with these requests. These users will verify the
> request against the listing of Commons users with credentials and
> personally place a call to the requesting organization with the
> results. Users who are able to respond to verification are current
> Commons sysops, and must never respond to verification requests about
> themselves.
>
> The faxes will come in via an online fax provider line which will
> deliver the electronic version of the fax to the same mailing list of
> users responsible for voice verification.
>
> Once a verifier processes a request, they must let the rest of the
> verification list membership know that they have handled the request
> (to prevent duplicate responses).
>
> -By fax
>
> ==Policy on Revocation==
>
> Any user who misuses the privileges assumed by accreditation, or
> forges a credential, may have their accreditation revoked either by
> consensus of the Community or request of the Board of Trustees. Any
> user may request revocation of a credential, however the request must
> have a legitimate reason.
>
>
>
> Upon revocation of credential, the Issuing Authority shall immediately
> place REVOKED on the Credential Roster. The user must immediately
> deliver all copies of the credential to the Issuing Authority in
> addition to a signed statement under penalty of perjury attesting to
> the destruction of any electronic copies. Knowingly using a credential
> after revocation is fraud and will result in notification of law
> enforcement and authorization to seize said credential(s)..
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of
> Blockbuster Total Access
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=47523/*http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/…>,
> No Cost.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
____________________________________________________________________________________
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
Below is the current draft of my proposal. Thoughts?
WIKIMEDIA COMMONS ACCREDITATION POLICY
(PROPOSED)
Without credentials, Commons photographers fall under the broad category of freelance photographers. Some museums have indicated disapproval of freelance photography of their collections, which is a significant stumbling block on obtaining good free photographs of historical items. By credentialing photographers, these museums might be persuaded to allow photography of their collections, for educational purposes.
Wikinews already has an accreditation process for reporters. Some individuals involved in that process have expressed an interest in having a pool of Commons photographers to accompany reporters. However, the photographers would also need credentials in order to gain access to the events, due to security precautions.
Interested photographers would need to be officially vouched by Commons. There will need to be a process for accreditation of users, and for revocation of credentials.
Commons will need to respond to requests for verification. This will allow the requesting organization to make sure that the photographer is indeed accredited by Commons.
In addition, the processes for Commons and Wikinews should at some point be merged on Meta to allow streamlined and efficent excahnge, issuing and verification.
==Policy on Accreditation==
Photographers will need to request accreditation from the Commons Accredition Project prior to attempting to claim accreditation. The request should be in the form of an entry, signed and dated, on a page specifically designated by the Project. The request must include a rationale for why the user wants accreditation. As an advisory precaution, the community will have 7 days to either voice objections or support for the request. At the expiration of this time period the user will either be granted a pending accreditation, or the vote removed.
The Issuing Authority will only issue a credential after the following criteria have been met.
-User has demonstrated that they are an established contributor
-Provision of their real name
-Verified their account
-Provision of a scanned ID with a picture of the user
-Provision of a passport sized picture that matches the one on the ID
Upon the fulfillment of the above criteria, the Project's Issuing Authority will generate a printable image of a personalized Commons Photographer ID Card that a user may print and laminate at their expense, and cause the addition of the credential to the Roster.
==Policy on Verification==
Commons credential verification will be processed by users who volunteer for the task. The request may come in in three forms:
Visit to a protected page listing community-accepted users with Wikimedia Commons credentials.
Voicemail message on a Commons phone line
Fax to a Wikinews fax line
The protected page will be kept by sysops on Commons.
The voice line will be a VoIP line with online voicemail delivery to a mailing list of users who volunteer to deal with these requests. These users will verify the request against the listing of Commons users with credentials and personally place a call to the requesting organization with the results. Users who are able to respond to verification are current Commons sysops, and must never respond to verification requests about themselves.
The faxes will come in via an online fax provider line which will deliver the electronic version of the fax to the same mailing list of users responsible for voice verification.
Once a verifier processes a request, they must let the rest of the verification list membership know that they have handled the request (to prevent duplicate responses).
-By fax
==Policy on Revocation==
Any user who misuses the privileges assumed by accreditation, or forges a credential, may have their accreditation revoked either by consensus of the Community or request of the Board of Trustees. Any user may request revocation of a credential, however the request must have a legitimate reason.
Upon revocation of credential, the Issuing Authority shall immediately place REVOKED on the Credential Roster. The user must immediately deliver all copies of the credential to the Issuing Authority in addition to a signed statement under penalty of perjury attesting to the destruction of any electronic copies. Knowingly using a credential after revocation is fraud and will result in notification of law enforcement and authorization to seize said credential(s)..
____________________________________________________________________________________
No Cost - Get a month of Blockbuster Total Access now. Sweet deal for Yahoo! users and friends.
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text1.com
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:16 PM, <magnusmanske(a)svn.wikimedia.org> wrote:
> +
> +// Fake user agent
> +ini_set('user_agent','MSIE 4\.0b2;');
> +
You should probably fake your own user agent? Something like commonsapi/1.0
> +// get file data via "normal" API
> +$ii_url = "http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?format=php&action=query&prop=imagein…:" . $img ;
Needs an urlencode($img);
> + if ( $m == 'Quality images' ) {
> + $titles['qualityimage'] = 1 ; // Just to make sure...
> + continue ;
> + }
> + if ( substr ( $m , 0 , 19 ) == 'Pictures of the day' ) {
> + if ( !isset ( $titles['potd'] ) ) $titles['potd'] = trim ( substr ( $m , 21 , 4 ) ) . "0000" ;
> + continue ;
> + }
You can get this as well from the [[Commons:Machine readability]] system.
Looks nice :) I would like to co-maintain this but unfortunately I
already have too much work at my hands :( I'll probably be committing
some occasional stuff to svn.
Bryan
Hi,
There is an interesting Firefox extension called Zemanta, that works
with some blogging platforms, to suggest images to match a blog post
you type. One of the sources they use is Commons.
See this post (comments) for a description of how it works and what
it's lacking:
<http://brianna.modernthings.org/article/97/zemanta-wikimedia-commons-for-bl…>
In particular,
"If you have an idea how to correctly capture wikipedia images
attribution (something that would assure at least 50% correct coverage
from 2.8M images), please help us! ;)"
Really, we can't blame people too much for not providing attribution,
when we don't give that information in a standard way, or give a
standard way of accessing it.
Now is as good a time as any to formally write an API to recommend for
other people to use. Aside from the MediaWiki API, there are three
main things I can think of that are often needed to be automated:
* identify any "problem tags" (files with deletion markers shouldn't
be used or indexed by third parties)
* extract license name(s) and URL for a given file
* extract author attribution string for a given file
So I propose we put our heads together and figure out the most robust
algorithm for each of these, and provide some sample code for each.
I made a start here:
<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:API>
Contributions and feedback welcome...
cheers,
Brianna
--
They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment:
http://modernthings.org/