This is super interesting. Wouldn't it be great if there were an open source, central repository for notebooks... hmmmmOn Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:32 AM, Aaron Halfaker <ahalfaker@wikimedia.org> wrote:I've been feeling this a lot recently too. Honestly, I'm looking forward to the death of the scientific paper. It's a weird dance to just get some results published. It's all too common that a key result will remain unpublished because the authors haven't been able to sell the story to some venue that doesn't directly match their intended audience. I'd much rather live in a world where results are shared and the story around those results develops collaboratively -- through conversation.But with so much riding on publication and citation rates (namely, lots of multi-million dollar grants), I don't see the end coming soon.-AaronOn Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Joshua Minor <jminor@wikimedia.org> wrote:______________________________Not sure if this got shared around, but an interesting discursive take, relevant many Wikimedia conversations:https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/the-scie ntific-paper-is-obsolete/55667 6/ Touches on cathedral vs. bazaar, info formats, information consumption, jupyter, open science, Wolfram's grandiosity, and more..._________________
Research-Internal mailing list
Research-Internal@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/research-intern al
_______________________________________________
Research-Internal mailing list
Research-Internal@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/research-intern al
_______________________________________________
Research-Internal mailing list
Research-Internal@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/research- internal