Hi editing,
Just to let you know that after the modifications to the Edit table in EL database, the reports have been able to catch up and back-fill until today. So https://edit-analysis.wmflabs.org/compare/ is working again.
Cheers!
btw, following up on a conversation James and I had on IRC, reducing the time span that's crunched into that sunburst didn't speed it up as much as I hoped. The source file is big (23M), and filtering it just takes forever. We'll try to think of ways to split that up into maybe the last three months and "all".
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Marcel Ruiz Forns mforns@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi editing,
Just to let you know that after the modifications to the Edit table in EL database, the reports have been able to catch up and back-fill until today. So https://edit-analysis.wmflabs.org/compare/ is working again.
Cheers!
-- *Marcel Ruiz Forns* Analytics Developer Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
We could go for weekly instead of daily maybe?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Dan Andreescu dandreescu@wikimedia.org wrote:
btw, following up on a conversation James and I had on IRC, reducing the time span that's crunched into that sunburst didn't speed it up as much as I hoped. The source file is big (23M), and filtering it just takes forever. We'll try to think of ways to split that up into maybe the last three months and "all".
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Marcel Ruiz Forns mforns@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi editing,
Just to let you know that after the modifications to the Edit table in EL database, the reports have been able to catch up and back-fill until today. So https://edit-analysis.wmflabs.org/compare/ is working again.
Cheers!
-- *Marcel Ruiz Forns* Analytics Developer Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
that is super simple, yeah, James / Neil: any problem with a weekly or monthly resolution for that sunburst? I mean, what's the shortest period of time you find useful there?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Marcel Ruiz Forns mforns@wikimedia.org wrote:
We could go for weekly instead of daily maybe?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Dan Andreescu dandreescu@wikimedia.org wrote:
btw, following up on a conversation James and I had on IRC, reducing the time span that's crunched into that sunburst didn't speed it up as much as I hoped. The source file is big (23M), and filtering it just takes forever. We'll try to think of ways to split that up into maybe the last three months and "all".
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Marcel Ruiz Forns mforns@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi editing,
Just to let you know that after the modifications to the Edit table in EL database, the reports have been able to catch up and back-fill until today. So https://edit-analysis.wmflabs.org/compare/ is working again.
Cheers!
-- *Marcel Ruiz Forns* Analytics Developer Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
-- *Marcel Ruiz Forns* Analytics Developer Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
I don't use the sunburst much myself, but I spoke to James; he said weekly would be fine, but he preferred not to go to monthly. He also pointed out that changing the resolution of the sunburst may make the date selector confusing: for example, if you select a range that includes 1 full week and 2 partial weeks, will the sunburst be calculated from the 1 week or the 3?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Dan Andreescu dandreescu@wikimedia.org wrote:
that is super simple, yeah, James / Neil: any problem with a weekly or monthly resolution for that sunburst? I mean, what's the shortest period of time you find useful there?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Marcel Ruiz Forns mforns@wikimedia.org wrote:
We could go for weekly instead of daily maybe?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Dan Andreescu dandreescu@wikimedia.org wrote:
btw, following up on a conversation James and I had on IRC, reducing the time span that's crunched into that sunburst didn't speed it up as much as I hoped. The source file is big (23M), and filtering it just takes forever. We'll try to think of ways to split that up into maybe the last three months and "all".
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Marcel Ruiz Forns <mforns@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Hi editing,
Just to let you know that after the modifications to the Edit table in EL database, the reports have been able to catch up and back-fill until today. So https://edit-analysis.wmflabs.org/compare/ is working again.
Cheers!
-- *Marcel Ruiz Forns* Analytics Developer Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
-- *Marcel Ruiz Forns* Analytics Developer Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Neil P. Quinn nquinn@wikimedia.org wrote:
I don't use the sunburst much myself, but I spoke to James; he said weekly would be fine, but he preferred not to go to monthly. He also pointed out that changing the resolution of the sunburst may make the date selector confusing: for example, if you select a range that includes 1 full week and 2 partial weeks, will the sunburst be calculated from the 1 week or the 3?
This is a good point, in this case, each week would probably be labeled when it begins. So if a filter fell after week 1 starts and before week 3 ends, the graph would render weeks 2 and 3, which is definitely not intuitive. I would argue that intuition about this doesn't seem likely anyway, and we could have a little pop-up somewhere that shows the date ranges that get picked up by the filter.
tracking here: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T130864
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Dan Andreescu dandreescu@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Neil P. Quinn nquinn@wikimedia.org wrote:
I don't use the sunburst much myself, but I spoke to James; he said weekly would be fine, but he preferred not to go to monthly. He also pointed out that changing the resolution of the sunburst may make the date selector confusing: for example, if you select a range that includes 1 full week and 2 partial weeks, will the sunburst be calculated from the 1 week or the 3?
This is a good point, in this case, each week would probably be labeled when it begins. So if a filter fell after week 1 starts and before week 3 ends, the graph would render weeks 2 and 3, which is definitely not intuitive. I would argue that intuition about this doesn't seem likely anyway, and we could have a little pop-up somewhere that shows the date ranges that get picked up by the filter.