On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 19:40 +0100, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: This is a development we're doing not in connection with our provision of metrics about MediaWiki, therefore it is not specifically aimed at improving the stats you currently have. In fact, it has been developed exactly for the scenario you mention: MediaWiki instances for which you want the get metrics via the API, not dumps. We just thought it could be interesting to have it for WMF data too, specially if it was integrated with the rest of development activity. In addition, we're completely open to suggestions about how visualizations could be useful for you. [...] Thanks a lot for these comments, they're very useful. Saludos, Jesus. -- -- Bitergia: http://bitergia.com http://blog.bitergia.com

On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 11:52 +0100, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: Thanks! It is pretty interesting. Our approach is a bit different: retrieve information from the wiki, store it into a database, and then produce analysis, visualization, etc from the database. But the functionality of StatMediaWiki is cool, indeed (however, it seems it still needs the dump to work, which is something we try to avoid). Saludos, Jesus. -- -- Bitergia: http://bitergia.com http://blog.bitergia.com

Hi Federico, On lun, 2013-11-11 at 19:40 +0100, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: Yes, this is our target. I am not sure we are going to add new things, this report is pretty exhaustive, but we are creating graphs similar to the others panels in Tech Community Metrics. We are updating also daily the data, as like the other data sources. And we are integrating user identities in the full process with the other data sources so for example, you can have the activity for a developer in git, gerrit, bugzilla, irc, mailing lists and mediawiki. I think we should link this report from Tech Community Metrics to get all details about statistics. Ok! taking a look to namespaces. It is easy to filter them using the API. The key is to understand which are content namespaces. Some recommendation? I have seen that "* Talk" pages are discussions pages name spaces so we can not include them. Yes, by default when getting allpages, we are getting just the ns=0 (Default: 0). So once this is fixed, we can recheck the data. Ok, we should research it. Queries are not so complex [0] but it is my first time with this API so I could be doing something wrong. Cheers [0] https://github.com/MetricsGrimoire/MediaWikiAnalysis/blob/master/mediawiki_… -- |\_____/| Alvaro del Castillo San Félix [o] [o] acs(a)bitergia.com - Chief Technical Officer (CTO) | V | http://www.bitergia.com | | "Bridging the gap between developers and stakeholders" -ooo-ooo-

On 11/12/2013 11:38 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: Maybe the only namespace that would be worth filtering is User / User_talk. All the rest are equally worth in wikis of software projects (the natural scope of Metrics Grimoire and the precise example of mediawiki.org). -- Quim Gil Technical Contributor Coordinator @ Wikimedia Foundation http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil

Hi! On lun, 2013-11-11 at 19:40 +0100, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: We have just published a new version using content namespaces, feature added to the tool (thanks Federico!), and the result are: http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/mediawiki.html Now for example: * Krinkle ** stats: 3366 (Until Sep 2013) ** korma: 3410 (Until yesterday) * Jeroen ** stats: 3303 ** korma (jeroendedauw): 3219 * kghbln ** stats: 2895 ** korma: 3025 So the numbers seems to be right. Jeroen is strange because in korme he has less editions than in starts, and should not be that. Yes, it matches the metrics definition: number of different editors per month. With the new data using all content namespaces for October 2007: 250 new pages, 2247 editions. Thank you very much Nemo! -- |\_____/| Alvaro del Castillo San Félix [o] [o] acs(a)bitergia.com - Chief Technical Officer (CTO) | V | http://www.bitergia.com | | "Bridging the gap between developers and stakeholders" -ooo-ooo-