On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mark Holmquist <mtraceur@member.fsf.org> wrote:
This is a longstanding problem. TL;DR: there isn't a good existing survey tool that suits our architecture, and we honestly don't care enough about surveys to build one in-house. Possible exceptions include the tools for surveying built during the original Usability Initiative or built in to VisualEditor during the alpha releases.For other large surveys, like the annual user survey we used to run via CentralNotice banners,[1] we've also used a third party solution, Qualtrics. I think we still pay for it actually. SurveyMonkey is actually a much better system, since we don't necessarily have to pay for it, and it's easier to use for survey takers and creators.In the past, we experimented with hosting FOSS survey tools like LimeSurvey,[2] but as far as I know, it was disabled because ops identified security problems with it. Maybe this has been fixed upstream? A cursory search of GitHub and StackOverflow doesn't show many other usable, actively-developed options in terms of a PHP-based FOSS survey engine.[3]In my view, we have much bigger pain points in gathering data, such as lack of a framework for A/B testing. Using SurveyMonkey is the least of our problems in gathering qualitative or quantitative data to make decisions with.
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics