Thanks, Dario, Tilman!
I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames
to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some
very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although
I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science
research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these
comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...
Best,
Heather.
Heather Ford
Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group
| @hfordsa
On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <tbayer(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi Max,
yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to
reading your summary!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <kleinm(a)oclc.org> wrote:
Dario, what's the timeframe for writing
reviews so they can get into the
signpost in time. 25th?
Maximilian Klein
Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
+17074787023
________________________________________
From: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli
<dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia
content and communities
Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open
for review
Hi everybody,
with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we
have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research
Newsletter [1]
Please take a look at:
https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual,
short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and
wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel
free to get in touch off-list.
Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
[1]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org