On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
Fair enough - I don't use it, and I think I'd
got entirely the wrong
end of the stick on what it's for! If it's intended to stop tracking
by third-party sites then it certainly seems to be of little relevance
here.
I think you're right to be concerned about this.
It is about expectations; people do not expect a NGO providing an
encyclopedia to be silently capturing reading behaviour data.
If the data is provided to other entities, even for noble research
objectives, people expect "Do Not Track" to cover this.
https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/6573
--
John Vandenberg