On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:46 PM, Leila Zia <leila@wikimedia.org> wrote:

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Sam Smith <samsmith@wikimedia.org> wrote:

> IMO #1 is preferable from the operations and performance perspectives as the
> response is always served from the edge and includes very few headers,
> whereas the request in #2 may be served by the application servers if the
> user is logged in (or in the mobile site's beta cohort). However, the
> requests in #2 are already

It seems the sentence above is cut, can you resend it?

Hah! I should've cut the whole sentence.

I was going to make the point that #2 already has a processing pipeline established whereas #1 doesn't. AIUI there'd have to be a refinement step added to Oozie to process the requests in #1 whereas the requests in #2 make it into the webrequest table with the appropriate value in the x_analytics column.

Thanks,

-Sam