>I've restructured the Wiki page in a way which is easier to understand from my POV.Please check if it's still correct.

Looks good, thank you for doing the changes.

>RE:stat1002. I've never used it before. I've only used stat1003 to verify event logging using zsub.

I never used 1003 as I do not think I have permits there. The same set of logs for EL present in the beta cluster are available (for production data) in 1002 at a given location for some months. Please take a look:

https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stat1002

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Bernd Sitzmann <bernd@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Nuria,

I've restructured the Wiki page in a way which is easier to understand from my POV.
Please check if it's still correct. The part I still was a bit confused about is https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/EventLogging/Testing/BetaLabs#Raw_stream_of_events_.28including_unvalidated_events.29

If events do not appear they might not be valid, check /var/log/upstart/ for either the server-side or the client-side processor logs. Validation errors will appear on those logs and they are very descriptive.

I don't think this is correct but I don't know which files you are actually talking about, how to verify event validation.

RE:stat1002. I've never used it before. I've only used stat1003 to verify event logging using zsub. Maybe you or someone else could show me sometimes how to actually verify event logging in production?

Thanks,
Bernd