Would it not make more sense for the team / teams that maintain statd & graphite to maintain statv?

As far as I see statsv is part of that ecosystem and also as far as I know the analytics team doesn't really have much to do with it.

On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 at 10:40 Gilles Dubuc <gilles@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi,

With Ori not responsible for statsv maintenance in an official capacity, should the Analytics team handle statsv maintenance going forward?

Ori has tried to leave it in a state that doesn't need much maintenance (read: restarts in case of issues) and is still trying to make it do so. Which means that it shouldn't require that much actual work other than keeping an eye on it and kicking it if the things Ori has been trying to put in place don't work.

Given that we're not the only ones using statsv and considering its function, analytics seems like the home it should get. What do you think?
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics