I came across another potential requirement from the WP Zero team:
add the x-analytics['zero'] to the dimensions.  This would allow the zero team to get pageviews per partner carrier.  Our partners are interested in this data, however, they don't want to share it with anyone as it is competitive data, and we can't make it public.


On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Jon Katz <jkatz@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Thanks Dan, and apologies if these are naive questions:

For mobile web can we also see beta v. stable?  This is important for tracking prototypes, which is one of the core product uses for this data.

For apps can we see ios v android? 



On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes@wikimedia.org> wrote:
On 5 June 2015 at 10:38, Dan Andreescu <dandreescu@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>> Gotcha. Reading that proposal it appears to be a proposal for a
>> methodology that will enable future proposals; where are the future
>> proposals?
>
>
> Well, so the geo cube has to guess a bit at who would find it useful in the
> future.
>
>>
>> It also says "in many countries, disease monitoring must be
>> carried out at the state or metro-area level" - which countries have
>> to be metro-level? Who are we risking the entire reader population
>> for, here? Is it one country, or ten, or?
>>
>> For what it's worth I love the idea of this kind of live stream. But I
>> want to make sure that how the various chunks are being prioritised,
>> and how critical they are to the outside world, is correlated - and is
>> correlated with the underlying data's sensitivity, at that. If we're
>> introducing risks by going down to city level and the actual use cases
>> for city level data are limited, let's not do that - but this proposal
>> doesn't provide thoughts on how limited those use cases are. It just
>> says that it's required in some countries.
>
>
> I agree with you, but I'm not sure the data is risky if it's k-anonymous.
> Most likely, just doing that will limit the countries for which metro level
> data is available.

I don't think it is if it is! As you said, though, we need to hammer
on it for a while to make absolutely sure it's okay, and using
lower-resolution data would not only make this easier but also reduce
the cost of getting people wrong (geolocating people to MA is less
dangerous than geolocating them to Arlington)

>
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
> Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>



--
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics


_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics