About 'Number of editors who contribute 1 edit per month?'
I'm hoping we're not going that use that number for our next fundraiser ;-)
The more inclusive our numbers are, the less meaningful, bordering on alternative facts.
A person with one edit in any given month is as much an editor as a person who looks at
the night sky a few times a year is an astronomer.
We have billions of those on this planet!
From: Analytics [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Neil Patel
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 23:06
To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an interest in
Wikipedia and analytics.
Subject: Re: [Analytics] Fwd: follow-up on editors
Funny story: I noticed that Aaron's graph has the 1-month new editor retention on
enwiki at about 7%, while I had recently done some queries
that put it a little under 4%.
It turns out I made an error in my Unix timestamp math, and I was looking at the 12 hour
new editor retention rate. It'll be interesting to see if the ranking of wikis by
retention changes significantly when I correct that.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Aaron Halfaker <ahalfaker(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Aaron Halfaker <ahalfaker(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Here's a graph of the retention rates of new editors in English Wikipedia.
Analytics mailing list
Neil Patel Quinn <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Neil_P._Quinn-WMF> , product