Graphs showing non-bot edits have been available for the largest
Wikipedias since earlier this month, see Erik Z.'s announcement at
http://infodisiac.com/blog/2013/07/new-edit-and-revert-stats/ .
E.g. English Wikipedia: http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/EditsRevertsEN.htm
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Ryan Kaldari <rkaldari@wikimedia.org> wrote:I was poking around on stats.wikimedia.org and reportcard.wmflabs.org to seeif I could find out how overall editing levels had changed (if any) over thepast year. Unfortunately, it seems that all of our "edits per month" graphsshow all edits, including bot edits. Since changes in bot editing levels areoften dramatic from month to month, this noise effectively cancels out theusefulness of the graphs. For example, you can see a huge spike in Marchwhen I presume the Wikidata bots were running at full force:http://reportcard.wmflabs.org/#secondary-graphs-tabhttp://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/ChartsWikipediaEN.htm#3My question is: Would it be possible to replace or augment these graphs withgraphs that exclude bot edits? I know that bot status is not stored in therevision table, so this would be quite expensive to tally. Would it beprohibitively expensive? Sorry if this is a dumb question.Ryan Kaldari_______________________________________________Analytics mailing listAnalytics@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics