Great idea Heather,

I will add my name to my review. Do you know any other review sites that aggregate in a wiki way that we could emulate?

Maximilian Klein
Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
+17074787023

________________________________________

From: wiki-research-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org <wiki-research-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Tilman Bayer <tbayer@wikimedia.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:16 AM
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Cc: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an       interest in Wikipedia and analytics.
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Hi Heather,

that's a cool idea, and we have actually been considering something
like this already. While the names of the reviewers are prominently
displayed in the byline on top (and also, many readers of the Signpost
and the newsletter are of course experienced in reading version
histories), showing them next to each review might be make attribution
easier. We just haven't found the time to implement it yet, like with
many other things for the newsletter. You are welcome to figure out a
suitable format and add these attributions in the upcoming issue,
let's follow up offlist if more information is needed.

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Heather Ford <hfordsa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Dario, Tilman!
>
> I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames
> to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
> paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some
> very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
> summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although
> I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science
> research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these
> comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...
>
> Best,
> Heather.
>
> Heather Ford
> Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
> EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group
> http://hblog.org | @hfordsa
>
>
>
>
> On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <tbayer@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Max,
>>
>> yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
>> is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
>> is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
>> take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
>> up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to
>> reading your summary!
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <kleinm@oclc.org> wrote:
>> > Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the
>> > signpost in time. 25th?
>> >
>> > Maximilian Klein
>> > Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
>> > +17074787023
>> >
>> > ________________________________________
>> > From: wiki-research-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > <wiki-research-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli
>> > <dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org>
>> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
>> > To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
>> > an       interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia
>> > content and communities
>> > Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open
>> > for    review
>> >
>> > Hi everybody,
>> >
>> > with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we
>> > have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research
>> > Newsletter [1]
>> >
>> > Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
>> > add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual,
>> > short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
>> >
>> > Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
>> > experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and
>> > wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel
>> > free to get in touch off-list.
>> >
>> > Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
>> >
>> > [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tilman Bayer
>> Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>> IRC (Freenode): HaeB
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>



--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l