Context for this?

The answer, for some of those questions, is like to be "none of them". Those that look problematic:

*We don't track self-reported language skills, because, well, userboxen are incredibly inconsistent between projects, and building up an accurate index would be a monumental effort. Wikidata would reduce the difficulty of this, but not to the point where it's either easy enough that it's no problem for someone to do in their spare time, or important enough that we've dedicated time to it.

*Tracking users between projects is something we're beard-stroking over at the moment because the CentralAuth infrastructure and db structure is the anti-pattern for "designing for researchers".

*We don't track contributions to mailing lists, and it would be very difficult to accurately and automatically line up mailing list contributions with users in a public tool unless we exposed email addresses as registered by MediaWiki - which we don't do, because that's personal information.

*We don't do any work around login time. We don't track it directly, and we can't approximate it indirectly (we can approximate edit session length, but that's a different thing entirely, and something done on an ad-hoc rather than regular basis).

On 25 May 2014 00:16, ENWP Pine <deyntestiss@hotmail.com> wrote:

Hi Analytics,

I'm looking for a way to do a cohort analysis for a presentation that I'm drafting.

I want a report that shows:
* A list of languages showing the users who speak each language as identified on their user pages
* A list of projects where users have made at least 5 edits in the past 12 months
* A list of group members that have administrator rights and which wikis are involved
* A list of public mailing lists where members have contributed in the past 12 months
* Number of public emails on those mailing lists in the past 12 months
* Total edits made by the cohort
* Total bytes changed by the cohort
* Total logged-in time for the cohort, if log-in time aggregation is being done

What automated tools could I use to create this report?

Are there any significant editor productivity metrics that are missing from this list?

Thanks,

Pine

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

--

Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation