Sorry, one word is clearly unclear and I should've expanded, as it turns out I misunderstood the context of Christian's comment.

I think it's farcical to establish the opinion of the entire community based on a small RFC.  I think Fabrice's proposal to gather the opinion of a much larger audience is great and I look forward to supporting it.  Most importantly, I think in the future we should lead with such an approach, and I call on Analytics folks to encourage / support that.

p.s. Sorry for the off-topic message, Dan.  On-topic, I agree with Erik Z's approach of A/B testing which viewer is default, it seems like good science.


On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Dan Garry <dgarry@wikimedia.org> wrote:
The issue of the RfC is way outside the scope of this list. Please, let's keep things focussed.

Dan


On Wednesday, 16 July 2014, Dan Andreescu <dandreescu@wikimedia.org> wrote:
What a farce that we have a vote and then ignore clear outcomes as
1:4, and even 1:13 if we do not like them :-(

Agreed 


--
Dan Garry
Associate Product Manager for Platform and Mobile Apps
Wikimedia Foundation


_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics