Nuria,

Toby asked me on Friday if I could help, and I gave a weak "ummmmm...... sure". I haven't begun working on it or anything. Announcing it to the list is Toby's way of making sure I don't back out. It's why he gets the big Director salary. :) Let's coordinate on Monday?

Best,

Ori

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Nuria Ruiz <nuria@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Looks like Ori is working on replacing vanadium.

There is a ticket created to that effect:   https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90363

However, I am not sure the best way to proceed forward is to change two things at the same time (the db and vanadium). 

But since that is purely and ops tasks you guys know what's best. 

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Sean Pringle <springle@wikimedia.org> wrote:

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Dan Andreescu <dandreescu@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> It seems to me that we should do the Vanadium hardware upgrade at the same
> time, if we're going to have down time anyway.  Can we bring the new beefier
> box online?  Last time I talked to Ori I understood such a box was already
> set aside for this by ops.

Oooh I didn't (and don't) know about this. Fair enough; one chunk of
scheduled downtime is fine with me, though I don't know how long it
will need to be if we include vanadium. If we do only the database
split it will be five minutes.

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics