I've always thought that blanking the page and replacing it with a template which says it's historical and links to the historical version of the page would be a good solution that balances preserving history with deemphasizing outdated information.On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Dan Andreescu <dandreescu@wikimedia.org> wrote:_______________________________________________> We have a documentation cleanup day coming up soon, and we've just got
> delete permissions so we can actually clean.
Please don't delete old content, mark it as {{historical}} or
{{outdated}} and archive it instead.I'm all for following the norm here, but wouldn't that mean it still shows up in searches? That's what I'm trying to avoid, minimizing the confusion.
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
--Neil P. Quinn, product analyst
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics