FAILED: SemanticException [Error 10014]: Line 12:8 Wrong arguments 'content_type': No matching method for class org.wikimedia.analytics.refinery.hive.IsPageviewUDF with (string, string, string, string, string). Possible choices: _FUNC_(string, string, string, string, string, string)

whut

On 16 December 2014 at 10:08, Andrew Otto <aotto@wikimedia.org> wrote:
That might be a email copy/paste problem; I see the non-symetrical quotes in my email.


On Dec 16, 2014, at 09:38, Toby Negrin <tnegrin@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Note that in Oliver's example, the quotes are double quotes, not single quotes. I didn't see the difference immediately.

-Toby

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Note that Andrew's example code doesn't run (at least, for me) because it needs to be:

CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION is_pageview as "org.wikimedia.analytics.refinery.hive.IsPageviewUDF";

Hive gets stupider every time I try to use it ;p

On 15 December 2014 at 20:47, Oliver Keyes <okeyes@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Yay! Will validate/patch/poke tomorrow :). If it works, presumably we'll want the output fired over to limn.

On 15 December 2014 at 19:01, Andrew Otto <aotto@wikimedia.org> wrote:
This needs more testing!  Validation!  Etc.  But woo!

This let’s you do:



ADD JAR /home/otto/refinery-hive-0.0.3-pageview.jar;

CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION is_pageview as 'org.wikimedia.analytics.refinery.hive.IsPageviewUDF’;

  SELECT
    LOWER(uri_host) as uri_host,
    count(*) as pageview_count
  FROM
    wmf_raw.webrequest
  WHERE
   (webrequest_source = 'text' or webrequest_source = 'mobile')
    AND year=2014
    AND month=12
    AND day=7
    AND hour=12
    AND is_pageview(LOWER(uri_host), uri_path, http_status, content_type)
  GROUP BY
    LOWER(uri_host)
  ORDER BY pageview_count desc
  LIMIT 10
;

…

uri_host         pageview_count


Time taken: 94.295 seconds, Fetched: 10 row(s)



On Dec 15, 2014, at 16:02, Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Oliver, Aaron – thanks for pushing this forward! Glad that we’re moving on with the implementation.

On Dec 15, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Totally!

On 15 December 2014 at 14:22, Andrew Otto <aotto@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Ah cool, didn’t realize there was a neutral definition.  We should call that the ‘formal specification’ then.

...of course, now that I've said that, cosmic irony demands we end up implementing in C, or something.
Hm, a UDF that does this rather than a Hive query would probably be better.  E.g.

  SELECT
    request_qualifier(uri_host),
    count(*)
  FROM
    wmf_raw.webrequest
  WHERE
    is_pageview(uri_host, uri_path, http_status, content_type)
  GROUP BY
    request_qualifier(uri_host)
  ;


Or something like that.

-Ao






On Dec 15, 2014, at 14:07, Oliver Keyes <okeyes@wikimedia.org> wrote:

It's totally tech-agnostic; the neutral definition is on meta. The hive query is just because, since we suspect that's how we'll be generating the data, it makes sense to turn the draft def into HQL for exploratory queries and testing.

...of course, now that I've said that, cosmic irony demands we end up implementing in C, or something.

On 15 December 2014 at 13:46, Toby Negrin <tnegrin@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I think the hive code is "representative" in that it's an implementation. It's certainly not the only permitted one. 

On Dec 15, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Andrew Otto <aotto@wikimedia.org> wrote:

 We're moving forward to generate Hive queries that will represent the formal specification.
Should a specific implementation (e.g. Hive) represent the formal specification?  I tend to think it should be tech-agnostic, no?



On Dec 15, 2014, at 12:15, Aaron Halfaker <ahalfaker@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Toby, that's right.  We're moving forward to generate Hive queries that will represent the formal specification.  

-Aaron

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes@wikimedia.org> wrote:
We've written the draft Hive queries and I'm reviewing them with Otto now. Currently blocked on Hadoop heapsize issues, but I'm sure we'll work it through :).

On 15 December 2014 at 12:10, Toby Negrin <tnegrin@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi Aaron, all --

I haven't seen any discussion on this which is a sign that we can forward with turning over the draft. Thoughts?

thanks,

-Toby

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Aaron Halfaker <ahalfaker@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey folks,

As discussions on the new page view definition have been calming down, we're preparing to deliver a draft version to the Devs.  I want to make sure that we all know the status and that any substantial concerns are raised before we hand things off on Friday, Dec 12th.

For this phase, we are delivering the general filter[1].  This is the highest level filter, and exists primarily to distinguish requests worthy of further evaluation. Our plan is to take the definition as it exists on the 12th, and begin generating high-level aggregate numbers based on it. In future iterations, we will be digging into different breakdowns of this metric, and iterating on it to handle any inconsistencies or unexpected results.  There's a few differences from Web Stat Collector's (WSC) version of the general filter that we want to call to your attention to.
  • We include searches -- WSC explicitly excludes them.
  • We include Apps traffic -- WSC does not detect Apps traffic
  • We include variants of /wiki/ (e.g. /zh-tw/, /zh-cn/, /sr-ec/) -- WSC hardcodes "/wiki/"
  • We don't include Banner impressions -- WSC includes them.
There are also some known issues with the new definition that are worth your notice:
    
  1. Internal traffic is counted
  • Note that WSC filters some internal traffic by hardcoding a set of IPs in the definition.  We are working on parsing puppet templates in order to automatically detect which IPs represent internal traffic.  This will be a /better/ solution, but it's not quite ready yet because parsing puppet is hard.  
  1. Spider traffic is counted
  • We will be using the User-agent field to detect and flag spider-based traffic.  This "tag definition" will be delivered in a subsequent definition.  This actually matches WSC, which does not filter spider for the high-level metrics.
These are problems we're aware of, and will be factoring in as we go forward with our next task: refining the definition using real, hourly-level traffic data. Thanks to everyone who has given feedback and participated in the process thus far, particularly Nemo, Erik, and Christian.

1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Page_view/Generalised_filters

-Aaron & Oliver

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics


_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics



--
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics


_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics



--
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics


_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics



--
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics


_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics



--
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation


--
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics


_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics




--
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation