Navigation on wikistats portal is far from ideal.

Right now you can find them as follows

http://stats.wikimedia.org

choose Special  

choose Edits & Reverts

you'll see links to overview per project which again links to page per wiki with detailed tables and charts

Erik Zachte

From: analytics-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:analytics-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Kaldari
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 6:25 PM
To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.
Cc: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.
Subject: Re: [Analytics] non-bot edits per month

Thanks! Those graphs are really useful. Is there any possibility that they could be added to the main stat pages for the projects, like http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/SummaryEN.htm, or even the report card pages?

It's unfortunate that such informative graphs are currently hidden away.

Ryan Kaldari

On Jul 23, 2013, at 7:41 AM, Tilman Bayer <tbayer@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Graphs showing non-bot edits have been available for the largest
Wikipedias since earlier this month, see Erik Z.'s announcement at
http://infodisiac.com/blog/2013/07/new-edit-and-revert-stats/ .

E.g. English Wikipedia: http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/EditsRevertsEN.htm


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Ryan Kaldari <rkaldari@wikimedia.org> wrote:

I was poking around on stats.wikimedia.org and reportcard.wmflabs.org to see

if I could find out how overall editing levels had changed (if any) over the

past year. Unfortunately, it seems that all of our "edits per month" graphs

show all edits, including bot edits. Since changes in bot editing levels are

often dramatic from month to month, this noise effectively cancels out the

usefulness of the graphs. For example, you can see a huge spike in March

when I presume the Wikidata bots were running at full force:

http://reportcard.wmflabs.org/#secondary-graphs-tab

http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/ChartsWikipediaEN.htm#3

My question is: Would it be possible to replace or augment these graphs with

graphs that exclude bot edits? I know that bot status is not stored in the

revision table, so this would be quite expensive to tally. Would it be

prohibitively expensive? Sorry if this is a dumb question.

Ryan Kaldari

_______________________________________________

Analytics mailing list

Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org

https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics