Understood for page creations.  The metric is named "Page creations".  We ought to have a metric called "Content page creations" or "Unique content page creators".  

One bit of complication: How do you feel about the draft namespace for enwiki?  Should it be included in content page creations?  

As for edits, the correlation is so strong between edits to content and edits to other namespaces that it doesn't matter which we use when looking for trends.[1]

1. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Refining_the_definition_of_monthly_active_editors

-Aaron

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:18 PM, James Forrester <jforrester@wikimedia.org> wrote:
On 4 November 2014 11:11, Howie Fung <hfung@wikimedia.org> wrote:

- Namespace Edits and Pages Created now include pages in all namespaces and pages that have been deleted.  The plots for these metrics generally show a step up.  On wikis where most of activity occurs on pages other than in namespace '0' (like Meta and Commons), you can see a dramatic difference in the data [2].

I just spoke to Kevin about this and there may be a disconnect around this.

For edits and pages created, it's important for us to be able to separate out main namespace edits and pages created from all other namespaces.  Actual content creation happens on the main namespace, so lumping all namespaces together actually reduces visibility into content creation.

Yeah; ​I was expecting this to be using $wgContentNamespaces (which varies per wiki), rather than hard-coding​ either NS0 (which is wrong e.g. for Commons or Wikidata) or all namespaces (which as Howie says is wrong because it covers non-content work).

J.
--
James D. Forrester
Product Manager, Editing
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.

jforrester@wikimedia.org | @jdforrester

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics