I'd say quantiles are a great idea for describing data of any distribution.  They're hard/impossible to do in SQL though.  


On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Gergo Tisza <gtisza@wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Aaron Halfaker <ahalfaker@wikimedia.org> wrote:
It turns out that much of this performance data is log-normally distributed[1].    Log-normal distributions tend to have a hockey stick shape where most of the values are close to zero, but occasionally very large values appear[3].  Taking the mean of a log-normal distributions tend to be sensitive to outliers like the ones you describe.  

A solution to this problem is to generate a geometric mean[2] instead.  One convenient thing about log-normal data is that if you log() it, it becomes normal[4] -- and not sensitive to outliers in the usual way.  Also convenient, geometric means are super easy to generate.  All you need to do is this: (1) pass all of the data through log() (2) pass the same data through mean() (or avg() -- whatever) (3) pass the result through exp().  The best thing about this is that you can do it in MySQL.

For example:

SELECT
  country,
  mean(timings) AS regular_mean,
  exp(log(mean(timings)) AS geomteric_mean
FROM log.WhateverSchemaYouveGot
GROUP BY country

Thanks, that sounds super simple!

What about quantiles in general? Even if the outlier issue is solved, we planned to have stats like speed of image display in the 90th percentile, and that still poses the same SQL problem. Or are quantiles unhelpful for lognormal distributions in general?

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics