tl/dr: Can feature vectors about relevance of (query, page_id) pairs be released to the public if the final dataset only represents query's with numeric id's?Over the past 2 months i've been spending free time working on investigating machine learning for ranking. One of the earlier things i tried, to get some semblance of proof it had the ability to improve our search results, was port a set of features for text ranking from an open source kaggle competitor to a datset i could create from our own data. For relevance targets I took queries that had clicks from at least 50 unique sessions over a 60 day period and ran them through a click model (DBN). Perhaps not as useful as human judgements but working with what I have available.This actually showed it has some promise, and I've been moving further along. An idea was provided to me though about releasing the feature vectors from my initial investigation in an open format that might be useful for others. Each feature vector is for a (query, hit_page_id) pair that was displayed to at least 50 users.I don't have my original data, but I have all the code and just ran through it with 100 normalized queries to get a count, and there are 4852 features. Lots of them are probably useless, but choosing which ones is probably half the battle. These are ~230MB in pickle format, which stores the floats in binary. This can then be compressed to ~20MB with gzip, so the data size isn't particularly insane. In a released dataset i would probably use 10k normalized queries, meaning about 100x this size Could plausibly release as csv's instead of pickled numpy arrays. That will probably increase the data size further, but since we are only talking ~2GB after compression could go either way.The list of feature names is in https://phabricator.
wikimedia.org/P4677A few example feature names and their meaning, which hopefully is enough to understand the rest of the feature names:DiceDistance_Bigram_max_norm_ query_x_outgoing_link_1D.pkl- dice distance of bigrams in normalized (stemmed) query string versus outgoing links. outgoing links are an array field, so the dice distanece is calculated per item and this feature has the max value.DigitCount_query_1D.pkl- Number of digits in the raw user queryES_TFIDF_Unigram_Top50_ CosineSim_norm_query_category. plain_termvec_x_category. plain_termvec_1D.pkl- Cosine similarity of the top 50 terms, as reported by elasticsearch termvectors api, of the normalized query vs the category.plain field of matching document. More terms would perhaps have been nice, but doing this all offline in python made that a bit of a time+space tradeoff.Ident_Log10_score_mean_query_ opening_text_termvec_1D.pkl- log base 10 of the score from the elasticsearch termvectors api on the raw user query applied to the opening_text field analysis chain.LongestMatchSize_mean_query_x_ heading_1D.pkl- mean longest match, in number of characters of the query vs the list of headings for the pageThe main question here i think revolves around is this still PII? The exact queries would be normalized into id's and not released. We could leave the page_id in or out of the dataset. With it left in people using the dataset could plausibly come up with their own query independent features to add. With a large enough feature vector for (query_id, page_id) the query could theoretically be reverse engineered, but from a more practical side I'm not sure that's really a valid concern.Thoughts? Concerns? Questions?
AI mailing list