Hey Pete!

We're working on exactly that -- except that we're aiming to have scores on a monthly basis rather than just yearly.

This will allow us to do interesting productivity analysis or flag articles with *trending quality* :)

With any luck, that dataset will be ready for use by the end of the week, but I'm not sure we're be able to load it into the labs databases right away.

-Aaron

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Peter Ekman <pdekman@gmail.com> wrote:

Amir,

Thanks for this. I mean WOW for lack of better words.
I'm especially impressed with the inclusion of the weighted scores
which allows the observation of small changes in quality. I was going
to suggest that you could do the same thing for the end of every year,
say for the last 5 years, so that we can see the improvement in
articles - but that would be too much to ask. But then I noticed you
are planning on doing this monthly. Double WOW.
Minor quibble - their are lots of disambiguation pages included. I'd
delete those if possible.

Thanks again,
Pete
PS - WOW

_______________________________________________
AI mailing list
AI@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai