hi rex,
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Nkansah Rexford <seanmavley(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 12 Mar 2016 8:58 am, "rupert THURNER"
<rupert.thurner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
second the technology that edit is easy highly
influences contributions.
mobile edit experience is by far not where it should be, for me it is
unusable. given that africa is a mobile connected country it is no wonder
that we have so little contributions.
At the moment, I personally find the mobile editing (both from the native
apps and web app ) to be great. There's not much I would add to the current
I don't do extensive editing on mobile, and I don't know anyone who makes
extensive editing on mobile. I've always seen the mobile editing to be an
added advantage, and not to replace the conventional desktop editing
experience. On the go, you wanna fix a typo in an article, you wanna add a
paragraph, that's how I see the mobile experience, and not as a
reference/citation editing experience, or not for the advanced editing
stuffs.
your edit statistics shows well what you say here:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/guc/?user=Nkansahrexford. a typo fixed to
test once a year or so. currently i cannot tell you "edit or shut up"
because i am not willing to do more mobile edits than you - and this
needs to change :) i am a software development person, and i know app
or browser editing can be done better, especially for citing
references. without taking up screen estate. given my zero
contribution to wikimedia software i am not allowed to criticize too
much. i only hope asaf is reading us and gets it prioritized higher at
WMF *wink wink*
rupert