Has anything changed in this aspect? Are images a contribution to wikipedia just because something is uploaded unto commons?
Isaac, you wrote: "It would be counterproductive to not accept images that are not properly described or categorized." - Please allow me to see this the other way round. My understanding of common is as a supportive tool for article authors. I do not find it productive to fill space with lots of badly (even not at all) categorized or poorly (even uselessly) described images.
Cheers
Ingo
Also, please check that one out
Very experimental...
Florence