Hi Ingo,
Thanks for your comments and sorry for the late reply, I have been busy
lately. Well, your assumption about quality as probable reason for some of
the highlighted problems might be right but I am dubious that this is
correct. Wait... Let's look at "Lagos Lagoon" for example. Lagos Lagoon
<https://yo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagos_Lagoon> is not a one-word article,
it's a standard stub yet it's not indexed. How do you explain this?. Thus,
I don't think article quality is a major reason why yo:wiki is poorly
indexed on Google, although it might be a contributing factor but I really
don't want to argue on this since I am not an expert in this area. I have
copied Runa Barttacharjee, Kartik Mistry, and Amir from the Foundation who
are expert in this area. Let's wait for their comments.
This advice, " forget about facebook" may not be a good one. The essence
of creating "Yoruba Wikipedia" page (like every other language Wikipedia)
on facebook is to create awareness about the project. I agree that this may
not have a direct impact on contents, unlike "Wikipedia Workshops" and
meetups.
However, your suggestion about improving the one-word article is a good one
and I'll surely look into that, obviously it's not what I can handle alone.
I'll discuss it with my community members who are native speakers of Yoruba
language.
For the record, over 95% of the short articles on Yoruba Wikipedia which
constitutes over 80% of the entire contents were created by bots. To be
honest, they are nothing but a mess that need to either be completely
removed or cleaned up. I'll discuss this with Demmy, a major contributor to
Yoruba Wikipedia who probably runs the bots.
Best,
Isaac.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Ingo Koll <ikoll(a)gmx.de> wrote:
Hi Isaac,
I do not understand any Yoruba but from my point of view I see quality as
probable reason for problems you mention including small readership.
Yoruba Wikipedia has many extremely short articles even on basic subjects.
( Odò (river), Erékùsù (Island), Omi (water), Òkun Atlántíkì (Atlantic),
Odò Niger (Niger River), Samuel Ajayi Crowther (first author of a Yoruba
grammar, first African Anglican bishop) are less than one or even a half
line of text.) It looks like much was written with an eye on the ranking
tables and the aim to have a large number of articles, even if there is
hardly content (Sáyẹ́nsì - science has 4 (!) words of text). In 2013 there
were 31,000 articles. Only 5,400 had more than 200 characters plus one
reference. (cf
https://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesArticlesTotalAlt.htm).
This is poor quality and not interesting for coming back, recommending it
to others by using the text on a blog or linking to it.
As for google - I think it IS indexed but it seems not the very short
ones. I find that google search shows me the Yoruba wikipedia. I entered
the above words in search and got most of them. But very short entries are
not visible on top of google search list (at all??). Like I search Sáyẹ́nsì
= 4 words = 25 characters and it does NOT show. But I GET the "Sáyẹ́nsì
categories" which have more words and I GET "Sáyẹ́nsì aládánidá" which
has
16 words. This looks like a major reason for few readers, because we get
most visitors on wikipedia thru the search machines.
So if you want to boost yo.wikipedia and if you forgive me an advice:
forget about facebook, start with the list at
https://yo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ẹ̀ka:Oluilu_ipinle_Naijiria (Category:State
capitals in Nigeria) and put some content into these 1-liners, many of
which until now do not show on google. Once you make them 5-liners, they
start to be helpful and will be visible on the search machines. And then
go to this list of 100 basic articles for any wikipedia and see that they
get 5-liners:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vital_articles/
Level/2 . (General rule: first sweat, then genius!)
I add a word for our co-readers in the foundation: for many small and
growing wikipedias the ranking list on Meta is a temptation to trick
themselves up. We have the situation that everybody has different
categories for stubs vs. articles and the rankings: Meta official count,
Meta list of 1000 articles every Wikipedia should have, the 10,000-list,
the count of stubs on wikistats, and finally the de-stub definition here at
african-wikimedians (some or many of the successes are maybe not destubbed
by Meta-criteria) . Eric Zachte probably saw the problem in his numbers
years ago and so did the "alternative article count" which kept the tiny
articles out, but it never was taken up and is not continued. I think it
would be helpful to integrate it into the regular statistic count and
convince the guys who do lists to agree on common criteria. The state of
Yo-wiki looks to me like a result of giving in to the temptation and it had
its reward by shooting up in the ranking - but what for?
Cheers, Ingo - Kipala
Am 02.12.2016 um 19:55 schrieb african-wikimedians-request@
lists.wikimedia.org:
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:48:57 +0000
From: "Olatunde Isaac" <reachout2isaac(a)gmail.com>
<reachout2isaac(a)gmail.com>
To: "Mailing list for African Wikimedians"
<african-wikimedians(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
<african-wikimedians(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [African Wikimedians] African-Wikimedians Digest, Vol 8,
Issue 136 African languages wikipedias
Dear Kipala,
Thanks for the clarification. I agree with your analysis and I'm sure it would be
helpful in moving forward to achieving our goal of making knowledge available in all
languages.
Below are the two major problems I have identified with Yoruba Wikipedia:
1. Yoruba Wikipedia is not indexed on Google and possibly on other search engines too. I
discovered this sometimes in July and I informally discussed the problem with a Steward on
facebook. Unfortunately, he has no idea of how to solve the problem. Yoruba Wikipedia like
the English Wikipedia is a digital encyclopedia. There is no way its contents could be
read if not indexed on Google or other search engines. I believe once this is resolved,
there would be a significant difference. I will discuss the problem with our engineering
team at the Foundation this week.
2. Yoruba is a major language in Nigeria but only 1 of 10 people are aware of its
existence. I recently launched the "Yoruba Wikipedia" page on facebook to create
awareness about it. In fact, I discovered recently that Yoruba language scholars and
students are not even aware of anything called "Yoruba Wikipedia". I believe
this can be resolved with outreach to Yoruba language department of academic institutions
in Nigeria.
Furthermore, I would appreciate any advice and recommendation in solving the highlighted
problems above.
Best, Isaac
_______________________________________________
African-Wikimedians mailing list
African-Wikimedians(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/african-wikimedians