1. I think it is much easier for participants to the project
when a structure can carry it from an administrative point of
view because it can take the burden of admin/financial tasks off
the shoulders of those interested to help, but not interested to
do the paperwork
2. I actually also think it is safer from a financial risk
management point of view :)
3. The contest took way more time and energy I would expect it
would take. I come out of it with a brand new and strong respect
for the organizers of Wiki Loves Monuments !
The number of volunteers in Africa is not unlimited and the
amount of practical support we got out of Africa was not much
(for example, Wikimedia France refused to relay the press
releases. For example, The SignPost did not care to even write a
line to talk about the contest. We were just ignored).
As such... the load is heavy for those involved.
Wiki Loves Monuments currently works in a more distributed
manner (organized in large part per country), but in most cases,
the country features a chapter or at least a developped user
group. This is not what we have. In a few countries, we have a
chapter and a small official user group. In most countries, we
have at best one person.
So I am rather little convinced that a model where groups of 1-5
people, in 10 different african countries, would request a grant
from WMF and handle things from A to Z in their country, would
actually work. But we will collect feedbacks on that matter
after the contest is over to see what would be the best option
for next year :)
4. Last... probably more than in other places in the world, we
got official rubber stamping requests. For example, a "non
wikimedian" jury member asked us official statement to describe
what the contest is about, how it is run, what is expected from
jury members and so on. For example, a potential local partner
asked for an official document proving that Samuel was indeed in
charge of facilitating the contest locally. This is typically
one of the reasons why chapters were created in the first place.
Often, external organizations are reassured when we show
business cards, official paper letter, signatures and so on. And
they prefer to send money to a bank rather than a paypal
account. And they prefer providing gifts to a brick and mortar
association rather than sending the gifts to a po box.
So yes... it takes a group to take initiative to organize it.
And we had this group this year. It was wonderful. I hope to see
even more people to get in the boat next year (globally or
locally). But just as I like Wikimedia France to be a "support"
structure in France for the Wiki Cheese project, I think we need
a "support" structure for WLA. And Africa Center does that.
Cheers
Flo
PS: gosh, I am glad this list is alive !!!!
Le 03/12/14 03:09, Asaf Bartov a écrit :
_______________________________________________
African-Wikimedians mailing list
African-Wikimedians@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/african-wikimedians
--