Wondering how the community will be allowed to interop with function definitions in their languages of choice...even extending functions with other languages. I didn't know about NAPI-RS <https://napi.rs/> existed until watching a podcast today (33:00) <https://youtu.be/Aeij24E-jHI?t=1980> where `#[napi]` macro was mentioned as an interesting PR <https://github.com/napi-rs/napi-rs/pull/696> and thus bringing about a very powerful feature of building pre-compiled Node.js add-ons in Rust. And now even ThreadSafe functions <https://napi.rs/docs/concepts/threadsafe-function>. How this might be utilized in Wikifunctions later on is an interesting thought experiment... imagine someone wanting to use a Node library that already affords a great implementation but also needs to be adapted or expanded for special fit and purpose... and in Wikifunctions by writing a Node.js addon in Rust language. Does anyone feel that the idea of extending functions with other languages (even native) might be too edgy a task on Function Composition? Or will this eventually be expected to be supported in whole or partially with the Launch requirements <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia/Launch_requirements> ,one of which is: - "Switching from one language to the other" Thoughts? Thad https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/ https://calendly.com/thadguidry/ _______________________________________________ Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list -- abstract-wikipedia(a)lists.wikimedia.org List information: https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/abstract-wikipedia.lists.wikime…