On 14 July 2020 at 03:11 Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com> wrote:

I

 

That is, automatically-generated articles could provide reasoning supporting, arguments for, and/or proofs of the contents of natural language sentences in a manner similar to how they can provide referenced sources and materials.

 

Any thoughts on these topics?

The idea is in tension with standard Wikipedia policies on original research and synthesis. Admittedly, it would be interesting to see some edge cases that were/were not acceptable under those policies. But on the whole, I think work in the sort of symbolic AI tradition suggested would be better received as research built on top of the drive to create articles, rather than integrated with it.

Charles