Facts can be seen as a special case of assertions, a special case of quotations. In Wikipedia, we should only be dealing with assertions (we must have a source) and in Wikidata, each statement is an abstract paraphrase of an assertion. Is there a reason why Wikidata statements do not have a unique identifier?_______________________________________________On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 20:21, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:_______________________________________________SJ - Rephrasing... reminds me of some of the discussion we had within Schema.org where I pushed for Quotation often. https://schema.org/Quotation where we didn't put much work into helping connect more dots, but still it's there.Quotations often tie into facts, "he said/she said", dispute resolution, etc.And where it seems Wikidata's quotation property might also somehow play a part in your proposal.Adam - I think it would be nice to have a concrete example of some clusters where a quotation is part of the fact basis.
Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list
Abstract-Wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia
Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list
Abstract-Wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia