Hello,
if you consider statements as each triple in Wikidata, they do already have
a unique identifier. For example:
is the id for the triple wd:Q27745008 wdt:P31 wd:Q146
What they don't have is a unique QNode.
Best,
Daniel
El mié, 17 feb 2021 a las 21:33, Grounder UK (<grounderuk(a)gmail.com>)
escribió:
Facts can be seen as a special case of assertions, a
special case of
quotations. In Wikipedia, we should only be dealing with assertions (we
must have a source) and in Wikidata, each statement is an abstract
paraphrase of an assertion. Is there a reason why Wikidata statements do
not have a unique identifier?
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 20:21, Thad Guidry <thadguidry(a)gmail.com> wrote:
*SJ* - Rephrasing... reminds me of some of the
discussion we had within
Schema.org where I pushed for Quotation often.
https://schema.org/Quotation where we didn't put much work into helping
connect more dots, but still it's there.
Quotations often tie into facts, "he said/she said", dispute resolution,
etc.
And where it seems Wikidata's *quotation*
<https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1683> property might also
somehow play a part in your proposal.
*Adam* - I think it would be nice to have a concrete example of some
clusters where a quotation is part of the fact basis.
Thad
https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/
https://calendly.com/thadguidry/
_______________________________________________
Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list
Abstract-Wikipedia(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia
_______________________________________________
Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list
Abstract-Wikipedia(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia