On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Brian Wolff <bawolff(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Some people have claimed that CACHE_DB might even slow
things down compared
to CACHE_NONE when used as main cache type (cache db is still better than
cache none for slow caches like the parser cache). Anyhow you should do
profiling type things when messing with caching settings (or any
performance settings) to see what is effective and what is not.
-bawolff
Wouldn't be surprised. ;) The only problem is that with CACHE_NONE, many
things (specifically, throttling mechanisms) won't work since the cache
isn't persistent across requests.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerromeo(a)gmail.com