Putting all of the issues aside, I'd like to know what the reason is for
hiding the preference. Let's assume for a second that VE does not hinder
users at all, that it's JS footprint is nonexistent, and that the interface
changes aren't that bothersome (which, to an extend, are true). Even with
all that, what reason is there to purposely deprive users of the choice to
completely hide VE if they're sure they have no intention of using it?
Apparently the VE launch was pretty successful. What damage would be done
by enabling this user option, and how bad is this damage that it requires
overriding the community decision just to stop it?
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:41 PM, MZMcBride <z(a)mzmcbride.com> wrote:
* What was the rationale for using ?veaction=edit
rather than ?action=edit
for VisualEditor?
This. Who the hell thought this was a good idea.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerromeo(a)gmail.com