Wiadomość napisana przez Randall Farmer <randall(a)wawd.com> w dniu 21 sie 2013, o
godz. 18:02:
Sadly they're moderating comments. I tweeted at
the author, with links to
WMF Ganglia as backup, and he definitely doesn't believe me; maybe
something from a WMFer would help, if anyone thinks it's worth correcting:
https://twitter.com/hassankhosseini/status/370090365354655744
Going by the Ganglia pages, actual Wikipedia has at lesat >2x the *RAM*
that their scenario has *disk*. Pretty fun. (If you're curious, Ganglia's
front page says it's tracking 14,744 cores on 988 hosts and 40T of RAM.
Their scenario has <20T disk. There may be additional capacity not in that
Ganglia setup, though it seemed to cover the obvious stuff.)
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:23 AM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 August 2013 16:12, hoo <hoo(a)online.de> wrote:
>
>> Am I wrong or did they actually calculate that for labs only (which
>> would be rather funny)?
>> At least they link to
>>
>
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Ask/-5B-5BResource-20Type::inst…
that run on up to 385 instances [...]") which AFAIK doesn't have
> any production servers.
>
>
>
> Heh. Please do post a comment of correction and post it here too, so
> it doesn't just vanish ;-)
>
>
> - d.
>
Now there is an update [0] that says: "We learned today that the data set we used for
this post might not be correct.".
No it's not like they've taken the wrong data - the data they've taken is not
correct! Shame on you data!
Michał
[0]