can. Later when it points to MW for most stuff the
contributor gets used to it :)
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Quim Gil <qgil(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On 04/07/2013 09:23 AM, Yuvi Panda wrote:
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Quim Gil
<qgil(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Why not doing exactly the same but on
mediawiki.org directly? All the
effort
put on promoting a brand new site could be put instead in promoting
mediawiki.org in a new, fresh way.
I think there's a slight misunderstanding.
I don't think so :) but it's fine. No stop energy.
If you see
http://whatcanidoformozilla.**org
<http://whatcanidoformozilla.org>, it
doesn't have much *original*
content by itself - it just links back to an appropriate page on
mozwiki. This one will also be the same - it will just link back to
appropriate
mediawiki.org pages.
Yes, yes. We could argue about the tactics of creating own sites for each
activity as opposed to build on top of your current platform but there is
actually little point in doing so.
Please continue with your initiative but document / discuss in your
preferred destination under Project:New contributors
This will help us being all in sync
And if the pages are not good enough,
I'll try improve them (or poke people into
doing that).
This is the big part of the work. And related to this: improving
mediawiki.org homepage and Developer Hub to reflect all the opportunities
for contribution you are describing.
--
Quim Gil
Technical Contributor Coordinator @ Wikimedia Foundation
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/**User:Qgil<http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/…
______________________________**_________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l<https://lists.…