On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 01:42 -0400, Tyler Romeo wrote:
I think this is a great idea, but I also have a new
idea for how we might
go about using the RESOLVED -> VERIFIED -> CLOSED workflow in BugZilla,
rather than just treating resolved as closed. One thing I noticed about MW
is that we're very much lacking in the test planning area. What if a bug is
marked as verified if either a) somebody makes and commits a test case for
it or b) it is determined that a test case is not applicable. That way
we'll have automated tests ensuring every bug we fix doesn't come back
again. Any thoughts?
I fail to see a strong relation with the VERIFIED status. One could also
argue in favor of writing a testcase together with writing the fix for a
specific bug report (so relating it to RESOLVED FIXED instead).
But this is getting off-topic for the "bug triage" subject anyway. :)
andre
--
Andre Klapper (
maemo.org bugmaster & GNOME Bugsquad)
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/